User Tools

Site Tools


notes:distro_comparisons

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
notes:distro_comparisons [2024/01/02 07:13] Sean Rhonenotes:distro_comparisons [2024/01/02 14:06] (current) – removed Sean Rhone
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Notes ====== 
- 
-  * The following list contains various operating systems and my opinions 
-  * These are my experiences below; YMMV 
-  * Any other distro or OS not mentioned was either not tested, or isn't worth using 
- 
-====== Fedora Workstation ====== 
- 
-===== Good ===== 
- 
-  * SELinux 
-  * Vanilla GNOME 
-  * Allows XFS and F2FS root partitions 
- 
-===== Bad ===== 
- 
-  * SELinux on servers (annoying and fragile) 
-  * RPM Fusion (shoddy behavior with mesa-freeworld VA-API ordeal) 
-  * GNOME (appindicator has been broken for years; it's either use GNOME on Fedora or some other DE not good enough for official presentation) 
-  * Wayland (absolute train-wreck for gaming, but being pushed anyway without regard) 
- 
-===== Conclusions ===== 
- 
-  * RHEL/CentOS is mostly relevant in US business and thus makes Fedora a good choice to be familiar with for a Linux sysadmin 
-  * GNOME works but is not optimal 
- 
-====== openSUSE Tumbleweed ====== 
- 
-===== Good ===== 
- 
-  * Rolling-release 
-  * Vanilla GNOME and Xfce 
-  * Allows XFS root partition 
-  * Various Wine packages (standard, staging, standard with nine, staging with nine) 
-  * Yast is nice for configuring the network on servers 
-  * LiveUSBs automatically have persistence even when ''dd'''d directly to flash drives 
-  * Has ''steam'', ''intel-media-driver'', and other packages of interest that Fedora doesn't have in default repos 
- 
-===== Bad ===== 
- 
-  * None 
- 
-===== Unsure ===== 
- 
-  * AppArmor (it's not annoying, but it's not obvious what all it protects) 
- 
-===== Conclusions ===== 
- 
-  * Xfce LiveUSB is a great sysadmin tool! 
- 
-====== Ubuntu ====== 
- 
-===== Good ===== 
- 
-  * All packages ever wanted exist in default repos 
-  * The largest support for Linux apps; if it exists it likely supports Ubuntu 
-  * oibaf PPA for graphics 
-  * Liquorix and xanmod kernels 
-  * [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Unicode_chart_Egyptian_Hieroglyphs|Loads theses fonts fine]] 
- 
-===== Bad ===== 
- 
-  * GNOME 
- 
-===== Unsure ===== 
- 
-  * Snaps (they work, I prefer them over Flatpak, but don't like the concept as a whole) 
- 
-===== Conclusions ===== 
- 
-  * Ubuntu is the best distro for desktop Linux in 2023 
- 
-====== macOS ====== 
- 
-===== Good ===== 
- 
-  * Message sync between iPhone and macOS 
-  * UI scaling (it somehow scales a lower res to a higher res while maintaining crisp text, and being compatible with programs not expecting this) 
-  * Better performance with windowed applications with eGPU on internal screen 
-  * Hackintosh builds are neat! 
- 
-===== Bad ===== 
- 
-  * eGPU needs 3rd-party software on <del>outdated</del> "unsupported" Macs (automate-eGPU) 
-  * Creating custom resolutions needs 3rd-party program (SwitchResX, which is paid) 
-  * Some games have significantly lower performance 
-  * Limited hardware diagnostic apps, and most are paid 
-  * :!: 2023/12: Can not under any circumstance get a recovery ISO or Online Recovery working on a mid-2010 MacBook Pro; Apple offers no guidance or proper tools to get their own OS working on their own hardware unless you're on Apple Silicon 
- 
-===== Conclusions ===== 
- 
-  * Lacks the hard-grit of Linux and performance for games on Windows, but makes up for it being the best visually :p 
-  * Might be interesting if using Apple's ecosystem 
- 
-====== Windows 10 ====== 
- 
-===== Good ===== 
- 
-  * Best performance, by far, undeniably, no matter the GPU vendor for anything with graphics ((Linux fanboys are pushing obvious inferiority to a concerning degree; I've tested a NVIDIA RTX 3060, AMD RX 6600 XT, and Intel UHD 630 and confirm this in 2023)) 
-  * The most reputable memory testing programs are Windows-only 
-  * Best VR (virtual reality) support 
-  * No hardware oddities (stuff just works and works as-expected, notably more-so than Linux) 
-  * WSL makes Linux barely appealing on desktop 
- 
-===== Bad ===== 
- 
-  * Some drivers are an absolute nightmare to source, but Windows Update does pretty well //most// of the time 
- 
-===== Unsure ===== 
- 
-  * WU forces an Alps touchpad driver that constantly polls the mouse pointer even when it isn't used, and has a service that eats CPU while doing it; WU does not offer an option to deny it, <del>but Device ID restrictions save the day</del> (disabling the Alps HID service works better) 
-  * CRU developer claims an Intel driver bug causes issues ([[https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thread-Custom-Resolution-Utility-CRU?pid=15053#pid15053|post]]), and naturally Intel isn't going to rush to release a driver to fix a 3rd-party tool, unofficial behavior, and on legacy hardware 
- 
-===== Conclusions ===== 
- 
-  * It just-works, and consistently 
-  * The best option by-far for gaming and VR 
- 
-====== Windows 11 ====== 
- 
-===== Good ===== 
- 
-  * Latest-and-greatest 
- 
-===== Bad ===== 
- 
-  * Can't hide clock in Taskbar 
-  * Oculus in early 2023 still had inconsistent performance with Blade & Sorcery running at like 50 FPS 
-  * Insider editions are notably slower real-world even on NVMe 
-  * :!: Could not (mid-2023) disable Windows Defender nor its real-time scan permanently even with NSudo; it randomly re-enables 
- 
-===== Conclusions ===== 
- 
-  * Non-insider may be viable for a general Windows install