User Tools

Site Tools


notes:distro_comparisons

This is an old revision of the document!


Notes

  • The following list contains various operating systems and my opinions
  • These are my experiences below; YMMV
  • Any other distro or OS not mentioned was either not tested, or isn't worth using

Fedora Workstation

Good

  • SELinux
  • Vanilla GNOME
  • Allows XFS and F2FS root partitions

Bad

  • SELinux on servers (annoying and fragile)
  • RPM Fusion (shoddy behavior with mesa-freeworld VA-API ordeal)
  • GNOME (appindicator has been broken for years; it's either use GNOME on Fedora or some other DE not good enough for official presentation)
  • Wayland (absolute train-wreck for gaming, but being pushed anyway without regard)

Conclusions

  • RHEL/CentOS is mostly relevant in US business and thus makes Fedora a good choice to be familiar with for a Linux sysadmin
  • GNOME works but is not optimal

openSUSE Tumbleweed

Good

  • Rolling-release
  • Vanilla GNOME and Xfce
  • Allows XFS root partition
  • Various Wine packages (standard, staging, standard with nine, staging with nine)
  • Yast is nice for configuring the network on servers
  • LiveUSBs automatically have persistence even when dd'd directly to flash drives
  • Has steam, intel-media-driver, and other packages of interest that Fedora doesn't have in default repos

Bad

  • None

Unsure

  • AppArmor (it's not annoying, but it's not obvious what all it protects)

Conclusions

  • Xfce LiveUSB is a great sysadmin tool!

Ubuntu

Good

  • All packages ever wanted exist in default repos
  • The largest support for Linux apps; if it exists it likely supports Ubuntu
  • oibaf PPA for graphics
  • Liquorix and xanmod kernels

Bad

  • GNOME

Unsure

  • Snaps (they work, I prefer them over Flatpak, but don't like the concept as a whole)

Conclusions

  • Ubuntu is the best distro for desktop Linux in 2023

macOS

Good

  • Message sync between iPhone and macOS
  • UI scaling (it somehow scales a lower res to a higher res while maintaining crisp text, and being compatible with programs not expecting this)
  • Better performance with windowed applications with eGPU on internal screen
  • Hackintosh builds are neat!

Bad

  • eGPU needs 3rd-party software on outdated “unsupported” Macs (automate-eGPU)
  • Creating custom resolutions needs 3rd-party program (SwitchResX, which is paid)
  • Some games have significantly lower performance
  • Limited hardware diagnostic apps, and most are paid
  • :!: 2023/12: Can not under any circumstance get a recovery ISO or Online Recovery working on a mid-2010 MacBook Pro; Apple offers no guidance or proper tools to get their own OS working on their own hardware unless you're on Apple Silicon

Conclusions

  • Lacks the hard-grit of Linux and performance for games on Windows, but makes up for it being the best visually :p
  • Might be interesting if using Apple's ecosystem

Windows 10

Good

  • Best performance, by far, undeniably, no matter the GPU vendor for anything with graphics 1)
  • The most reputable memory testing programs are Windows-only
  • Best VR (virtual reality) support
  • No hardware oddities (stuff just works and works as-expected, notably more-so than Linux)
  • WSL makes Linux barely appealing on desktop

Bad

  • Some drivers are an absolute nightmare to source, but Windows Update does pretty well most of the time

Unsure

  • WU forces an Alps touchpad driver that constantly polls the mouse pointer even when it isn't used, and has a service that eats CPU while doing it; WU does not offer an option to deny it, but Device ID restrictions save the day (disabling the Alps HID service works better)
  • CRU developer claims an Intel driver bug causes issues (post), and naturally Intel isn't going to rush to release a driver to fix a 3rd-party tool, unofficial behavior, and on legacy hardware

Conclusions

  • It just-works, and consistently
  • The best option by-far for gaming and VR

Windows 11

Good

  • Latest-and-greatest

Bad

  • Can't hide clock in Taskbar
  • Oculus in early 2023 still had inconsistent performance with Blade & Sorcery running at like 50 FPS
  • Insider editions are notably slower real-world even on NVMe
  • :!: Could not (mid-2023) disable Windows Defender nor its real-time scan permanently even with NSudo; it randomly re-enables

Conclusions

  • Non-insider may be viable for a general Windows install
1)
Linux fanboys are pushing obvious inferiority to a concerning degree; I've tested a NVIDIA RTX 3060, AMD RX 6600 XT, and Intel UHD 630 and confirm this in 2023
/var/www/wiki/data/attic/notes/distro_comparisons.1704197639.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/01/02 07:13 by Sean Rhone