personal:operating_systems_comparisons
This is an old revision of the document!
Windows
11
- 2024/12/23: No-go because of Defender real-time scanning/tamper protection not being able to be disabled reliably (LTSC 24H2)
- Windows future-use no-go if Defender enforcement is continued 1)
10
- Good until 2032 (Defender can be disabled reliably)
7
- May be useful for testing FlightGear, Intel GPU, and OpenGL performance (post)
Linux
Fedora
- F30~: RPM Fusion,
mesa-va-drivers-freeworld
(AMDGPU), and Fedora update conflicts would result in broken graphics stack/black screen after Fedora updates if Mesa updated - F41:
GSK_RENDERER
was an odd widespread-breaking change - Prioritizing Flatpaks and Atomic/Immutable
- Leaders of deprecating Xorg; leaving it broken F41 implying lack-of testing/QA or “planned-obsolesce” (post)
Ubuntu
- Works fine
Debian
- Only (listed) distro to install successfully to a 512 MB VPS
openSUSE TW
- Switching from AppArmor to SELinux
- YaST conflicts with traditional Linux configuration style, and is SUSE-specific
- Xfce OTB looks dated and implies lack-of UX/QA care
BSD
FreeBSD
- 14.2-R
drm-kmod
was a mess and required trawling forums and guess-work (post) - Files between ZFS and NTFS on years-old files caused I/O errors during rsync/cp (thread)
- Wifi set-up is complex, and slow (2.5MB/s, no AC)
- Android
adb
doesn't work (post) - rc service scripts look complex to hand-craft compared to systemd
C:/www/wiki/data/attic/personal/operating_systems_comparisons.1734957151.txt.gz · Last modified: by Sean Rhone