User Tools

Site Tools


notes:distro_comparisons

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
notes:distro_comparisons [2023/06/29 15:23] – removed Sean Rhonenotes:distro_comparisons [2024/01/02 07:13] Sean Rhone
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Notes ======
 +
 +  * The following list contains various operating systems and my opinions
 +  * These are my experiences below; YMMV
 +  * Any other distro or OS not mentioned was either not tested, or isn't worth using
 +
 +====== Fedora Workstation ======
 +
 +===== Good =====
 +
 +  * SELinux
 +  * Vanilla GNOME
 +  * Allows XFS and F2FS root partitions
 +
 +===== Bad =====
 +
 +  * SELinux on servers (annoying and fragile)
 +  * RPM Fusion (shoddy behavior with mesa-freeworld VA-API ordeal)
 +  * GNOME (appindicator has been broken for years; it's either use GNOME on Fedora or some other DE not good enough for official presentation)
 +  * Wayland (absolute train-wreck for gaming, but being pushed anyway without regard)
 +
 +===== Conclusions =====
 +
 +  * RHEL/CentOS is mostly relevant in US business and thus makes Fedora a good choice to be familiar with for a Linux sysadmin
 +  * GNOME works but is not optimal
 +
 +====== openSUSE Tumbleweed ======
 +
 +===== Good =====
 +
 +  * Rolling-release
 +  * Vanilla GNOME and Xfce
 +  * Allows XFS root partition
 +  * Various Wine packages (standard, staging, standard with nine, staging with nine)
 +  * Yast is nice for configuring the network on servers
 +  * LiveUSBs automatically have persistence even when ''dd'''d directly to flash drives
 +  * Has ''steam'', ''intel-media-driver'', and other packages of interest that Fedora doesn't have in default repos
 +
 +===== Bad =====
 +
 +  * None
 +
 +===== Unsure =====
 +
 +  * AppArmor (it's not annoying, but it's not obvious what all it protects)
 +
 +===== Conclusions =====
 +
 +  * Xfce LiveUSB is a great sysadmin tool!
 +
 +====== Ubuntu ======
 +
 +===== Good =====
 +
 +  * All packages ever wanted exist in default repos
 +  * The largest support for Linux apps; if it exists it likely supports Ubuntu
 +  * oibaf PPA for graphics
 +  * Liquorix and xanmod kernels
 +  * [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Unicode_chart_Egyptian_Hieroglyphs|Loads theses fonts fine]]
 +
 +===== Bad =====
 +
 +  * GNOME
 +
 +===== Unsure =====
 +
 +  * Snaps (they work, I prefer them over Flatpak, but don't like the concept as a whole)
 +
 +===== Conclusions =====
 +
 +  * Ubuntu is the best distro for desktop Linux in 2023
 +
 +====== macOS ======
 +
 +===== Good =====
 +
 +  * Message sync between iPhone and macOS
 +  * UI scaling (it somehow scales a lower res to a higher res while maintaining crisp text, and being compatible with programs not expecting this)
 +  * Better performance with windowed applications with eGPU on internal screen
 +  * Hackintosh builds are neat!
 +
 +===== Bad =====
 +
 +  * eGPU needs 3rd-party software on <del>outdated</del> "unsupported" Macs (automate-eGPU)
 +  * Creating custom resolutions needs 3rd-party program (SwitchResX, which is paid)
 +  * Some games have significantly lower performance
 +  * Limited hardware diagnostic apps, and most are paid
 +  * :!: 2023/12: Can not under any circumstance get a recovery ISO or Online Recovery working on a mid-2010 MacBook Pro; Apple offers no guidance or proper tools to get their own OS working on their own hardware unless you're on Apple Silicon
 +
 +===== Conclusions =====
 +
 +  * Lacks the hard-grit of Linux and performance for games on Windows, but makes up for it being the best visually :p
 +  * Might be interesting if using Apple's ecosystem
 +
 +====== Windows 10 ======
 +
 +===== Good =====
 +
 +  * Best performance, by far, undeniably, no matter the GPU vendor for anything with graphics ((Linux fanboys are pushing obvious inferiority to a concerning degree; I've tested a NVIDIA RTX 3060, AMD RX 6600 XT, and Intel UHD 630 and confirm this in 2023))
 +  * The most reputable memory testing programs are Windows-only
 +  * Best VR (virtual reality) support
 +  * No hardware oddities (stuff just works and works as-expected, notably more-so than Linux)
 +  * WSL makes Linux barely appealing on desktop
 +
 +===== Bad =====
 +
 +  * Some drivers are an absolute nightmare to source, but Windows Update does pretty well //most// of the time
 +
 +===== Unsure =====
 +
 +  * WU forces an Alps touchpad driver that constantly polls the mouse pointer even when it isn't used, and has a service that eats CPU while doing it; WU does not offer an option to deny it, <del>but Device ID restrictions save the day</del> (disabling the Alps HID service works better)
 +  * CRU developer claims an Intel driver bug causes issues ([[https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thread-Custom-Resolution-Utility-CRU?pid=15053#pid15053|post]]), and naturally Intel isn't going to rush to release a driver to fix a 3rd-party tool, unofficial behavior, and on legacy hardware
 +
 +===== Conclusions =====
 +
 +  * It just-works, and consistently
 +  * The best option by-far for gaming and VR
 +
 +====== Windows 11 ======
 +
 +===== Good =====
 +
 +  * Latest-and-greatest
 +
 +===== Bad =====
 +
 +  * Can't hide clock in Taskbar
 +  * Oculus in early 2023 still had inconsistent performance with Blade & Sorcery running at like 50 FPS
 +  * Insider editions are notably slower real-world even on NVMe
 +  * :!: Could not (mid-2023) disable Windows Defender nor its real-time scan permanently even with NSudo; it randomly re-enables
 +
 +===== Conclusions =====
 +
 +  * Non-insider may be viable for a general Windows install